<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>aiusepsi.co.uk &#187; ubuntu</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aiusepsi.co.uk/tag/ubuntu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aiusepsi.co.uk</link>
	<description>Andy Simpson&#039;s personal blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:09:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why Ubuntu / Linux isn&#8217;t Really Ready for Consumers&#8230; Yet.</title>
		<link>http://aiusepsi.co.uk/2009/why-ubuntu-linux-isnt-really-ready-for-consumers/</link>
		<comments>http://aiusepsi.co.uk/2009/why-ubuntu-linux-isnt-really-ready-for-consumers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aiusepsi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open-source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ubuntu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aiusepsi.co.uk/?p=378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Update: Hey Reddit! This post has much nastier things to say about Ubuntu than the one below, so I think you&#8217;ll like it more. No, I&#8217;m not a Microsoft astroturfer. Wish I was though, I wouldn&#8217;t mind the money. Honestly, &#8230; <a href="http://aiusepsi.co.uk/2009/why-ubuntu-linux-isnt-really-ready-for-consumers/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Update: </strong>Hey Reddit! This post has <a href="http://aiusepsi.co.uk/2007/if-this-is-what-linux-has-to-offer/">much nastier things</a> to say about Ubuntu than the one below, so I think you&#8217;ll like it more. No, I&#8217;m not a Microsoft astroturfer. Wish I was though, I wouldn&#8217;t mind the money. Honestly, I want to like Ubuntu / Linux in general. This is why I tried Ubuntu again after it sucking the first time, and why I bought an Eee PC running a Xandros variant without even considering putting XP on it. But you guys don&#8217;t make it easy.</p>
<p>As anyone who follows my <a href="http://twitter.com/aiusepsi" target="_blank">Twitter feed</a> will know, I&#8217;ve recently been trying to install Ubuntu on my desktop.</p>
<p>On the whole it&#8217;s not that painful, the LiveCD lets you get a feel for the system, the installation is mostly painless even if you want to dual-boot etc, the interface is clean and easy to use, almost everything you&#8217;d ever want is already installed and almost anything else is available from the package manager. It&#8217;s great when it works. Really great.</p>
<p>The trouble is, often it doesn&#8217;t. For example the wireless card on this machine seems to have issues. Sometimes it won&#8217;t connect to a wireless network, sometimes it totally hangs the machine. The solution to this seems to be to dive in head-first into config files and the command-line, rip out the provided open source driver, and whack in a layer that will let me use a Windows driver.</p>
<p>My first attempt to do this just disabled wireless on the machine entirely, which wasn&#8217;t a forward step. I was honestly quite lucky to get it back to where I started from.</p>
<p>Software support can also sometimes be iffy. Stuff that should be simple like Adobe Air seemingly requires a trip through the terminal to convince to work. Another rather significant downside is that a lot of applications you&#8217;re used to using don&#8217;t have versions for Linux. You can use WINE to get Windows applications working, mostly, but it&#8217;s not an ideal state of affairs. And you can forget about playing games; support is even more dire than Mac gaming. That is unless you once again want to press WINE into service; frankly though it feels slightly iffy running Spotify, let alone TF2.</p>
<p>So my point here is three-fold:</p>
<ol>
<li>Hardware support is patchy.</li>
<li>Proprietary software can be hard to get working / unavailable.</li>
<li>If something goes wrong, it requires a lot of scary stuff (command-line, etc.) to fix.</li>
</ol>
<p>See, I&#8217;m sure that if I had a working machine and a few months I&#8217;d start to learn the Linux-fu necessary to deal with this, but it&#8217;s just a pain if something as essential as Wi-Fi doesn&#8217;t just work, or if you can&#8217;t play your favourite games.</p>
<p>They&#8217;ve got a long way to go with hardware support, and it&#8217;s going to be an uphill battle every step of the way. There&#8217;s a lot of hardware manufacturers who aren&#8217;t going to provide Linux drivers, and there&#8217;s a dogmatic craziness in the Linux world that <strong>THOU SHALT NOT</strong> distribute non-free drivers with your distribution, which means that nobody just provides Windows drivers, or makes it easy to get Windows drivers. It&#8217;s totally daft, and it&#8217;s not helped by nutjobs like Richard Stallman. I guess you can put me into the camp who doesn&#8217;t like the GPL. Give me the BSD license any day.</p>
<p>The software difficulties are as equally hard to overcome; you&#8217;d have to deal with the horrible Balkanisation of the Linux distros for one thing so that people would have something simple to compile binaries against. Idealism isn&#8217;t going to get people to give away the source code to everything.</p>
<p>However, there&#8217;s certainly a market for Ubuntu / Linux systems where you can be sure of the hardware configuration and fix all the problems in advance. This means that something like <a href="http://www.eeebuntu.org/">eeebuntu</a> works really rather well, and is supported rather better than Asus managed to support the Eee themselves. It&#8217;s a pleasure to use, and makes me see myself using my Eee a lot more in the future.</p>
<p>Similarly, if all the software you could ever want, literally, is encompassed by the repositories of your chosen distro, then it&#8217;s also a very comfortable experience where you can be reasonably sure that everything will just work, which is literally the ideal consumer experience.</p>
<p>So, if you lie within some narrow definition of &#8220;consumer&#8221; then Ubuntu is going to be perfect for you. If you lie just a little to the edges, it&#8217;s going to suck. There&#8217;s really no middle ground between &#8220;idealised consumer&#8221; and &#8220;pretty hardcore techie&#8221;. I guess that&#8217;s why they&#8217;re going to carry on working with it. If they can expand that consumer window, this could be heading somewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://aiusepsi.co.uk/2009/why-ubuntu-linux-isnt-really-ready-for-consumers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If this is what Linux has to offer&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://aiusepsi.co.uk/2007/if-this-is-what-linux-has-to-offer/</link>
		<comments>http://aiusepsi.co.uk/2007/if-this-is-what-linux-has-to-offer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 02:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aiusepsi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ubuntu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aiusepsi.co.uk/?p=57</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I&#8217;m trying to install Ubuntu, because heck, it&#8217;s time I tried it. So I head to the Ubuntu site, read some fairly encouraging spiel about how Ubuntu is easy to install, will be full of fun &#38; joy, be &#8230; <a href="http://aiusepsi.co.uk/2007/if-this-is-what-linux-has-to-offer/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I&#8217;m trying to install Ubuntu, because heck, it&#8217;s time I tried it. So I head to the Ubuntu site, read some fairly encouraging spiel about how Ubuntu is easy to install, will be full of fun &amp; joy, be packed full of helpful apps to get me going, and all will be well and good when I&#8217;m dancing in hippie-land with all those people who have thrown off the shackles of the evil empire.</p>
<p>One download and burn to CD later and I pop the thing in my CD drive, restart my computer, and boot from the CD. I go to the installation option, it starts to load and&#8230; bang, it drops to a text shell and starts spewing errors.</p>
<p>Fantastic. Tells me that I can type &#8220;help&#8221; to look at the availiable commands. Apart from the ones named the same as DOS commands I have no idea what they do. Am I being required to prove my worth before I am allowed to install the damn thing? No, it&#8217;s just shit. Either that or my computer&#8217;s hardware is somehow completely buggered in some way that only affects free software.</p>
<p>To cut a long story short, Ubuntu blows chunks. At least Windows fucking well installs. At this point I&#8217;m fairly happy to have paid a premium for a product that ACTUALLY DOES SOMETHING.</p>
<p>Fuck. This. Shit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://aiusepsi.co.uk/2007/if-this-is-what-linux-has-to-offer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

